Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

The capability layer

APIREST + bulk accessMCP serverCallable by AI agentsFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationSource-vs-source diffsEntity graphSnapshotsPoint-in-time, bitemporal

By use case

Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligence

By buyer

Compliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

The differentiator

Coverage & sourcesThe catalogFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareFacility qualityBrowse all datasets →
Research

The dev on-ramp

DocsAPI referenceMCPQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inTry the FHIR sandbox →Request access →

Platform

APIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots

Solutions

Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

Data

Coverage & sourcesFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareBrowse all datasets →
Research

Developers

DocsAPI referenceMCPQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inTry the FHIR sandbox →Request access →

GUIDE · EXCLUSION & SANCTIONS SCREENING

Is this party barred — anywhere, provably.

One bridge across every exclusion list that matters: the OIG LEIE and state Medicaid lists for healthcare, and SAM.gov debarment for federal contracting. This guide routes to the data, the studies, and the workflow that turn a roster into a dated, source-cited screen.

Request accessHow to screen a roster →

The short answer

What is exclusion and sanctions screening?

Exclusion screening is checking a person or organization against the government lists of parties barred from federal programs — and keeping a dated record of the check. In healthcare, that means the OIG LEIE, SAM.gov, and each state's Medicaid exclusion list; in federal contracting, it means SAM.gov debarment and suspension. A party barred in one place can stay active in another — which is exactly the gap a single-list check misses.

Fonteum screens across all of them at once, returns an excluded-anywhere signal, and signs every match back to its source file and snapshot date — the record an audit asks for. This hub is where the healthcare and federal-contracting sides meet.

Screen & search

Start a screen, or check a single party. The roster screen returns a signed attestation across every list.

How-to

How to screen for OIG, SAM & state exclusions

The statute-anchored guide: the monthly requirement, the lists, the cost of a miss, and a free full-roster screen.

Open →
Use case

Exclusion & sanctions screening + monitoring

The dual-buyer page: an API for developers and a dated audit record for compliance teams.

Open →
Tool

Search the OIG LEIE by name or NPI

Check one provider against the federal healthcare exclusion list in a single query.

Open →
Brand hub

The /sanctions exclusion data hub

The public OIG LEIE aggregate surface — free to browse and cite.

Open →

The exclusion datasets

Dataset

OIG LEIE — federal healthcare exclusions

Every party excluded from federal healthcare programs under SSA §1128, with field-level provenance.

Open →
Dataset

State Medicaid exclusion lists

The state lists mirrored into one excluded-anywhere screen — a single-state bar still surfaces.

Open →
Glossary

What is the OIG LEIE?

The List of Excluded Individuals and Entities, defined.

Open →
Glossary

Healthcare program exclusion, defined

What an exclusion is and what it bars a provider from.

Open →
Glossary

The civil money penalty

The per-item penalty for employing or contracting an excluded party.

Open →

Research on exclusions

Original studies on who is barred, who stays active, and where the lists disagree — the citable evidence behind the screen.

Research

Barred but still active in the directory

How many excluded providers still appear as active in the national provider registry.

Open →
Research

Excluded providers still enrolled in Medicare

Where an OIG exclusion and an active PECOS enrollment overlap.

Open →
Research

The federal–state exclusion gap

Parties on a state list that never appear on the federal LEIE.

Open →
Research

OIG exclusion patterns

What the LEIE shows about exclusion type, basis, and trend over time.

Open →
Research

The excluded-providers landscape

A full read of the federal healthcare exclusion population.

Open →
Research

Industry payments to excluded providers

Open Payments dollars flowing to parties already on the exclusion list.

Open →

Federal contracting — the cross-vertical bridge

The same screening problem on the procurement side: who is debarred, and who got paid anyway. These /gov surfaces are the federal-contracting half of this hub.

Vertical

Federal contracting on Fonteum

The procurement vertical — SAM.gov exclusions, entity records, and the same provable-records model.

Open →
Answers

Federal-contracting questions, answered

An answer-engine hub for debarment, suspension, and exclusion in procurement.

Open →
Study

The federal suspension & debarment scorecard

Which agencies drive the active SAM exclusion population, by share.

Open →
Study

Contracts awarded during an active exclusion

Procurement leakage: awards that landed while the party was barred.

Open →
Answer

What is an exclusion in federal contracting?

The procurement definition, and how it differs from a healthcare exclusion.

Open →
Answer

Suspension vs. debarment

The two federal-contracting bars and what each one means.

Open →

Make it defensible

Use case

Build a defensible audit-evidence program

Turn each screen into a signed, dated artifact an auditor can re-check.

Open →
For compliance

Fonteum for compliance & risk teams

The compliance buyer's path: roster screening, monitoring, and the evidence trail.

Open →

Common questions

Answers in one line each

What lists should a healthcare exclusion screen cover?
A complete healthcare screen covers two federal lists — the OIG LEIE and SAM.gov — plus every applicable state Medicaid exclusion list. A party barred by one state can stay off the federal LEIE, so a multi-state roster has to clear each jurisdiction, not just the federal pair.
How is exclusion screening different in federal contracting?
Federal contracting screens against SAM.gov suspension and debarment rather than the healthcare LEIE, and the bar is procurement-wide. The mechanic is identical — check the party against the government's list and keep a dated record — which is why Fonteum runs both off one provable-records model. Cross-vertical questions route through this hub.
How often must exclusion screening run?
The OIG republishes the LEIE monthly and recommends monthly screening of all employees and contractors, because the civil money penalty for employing an excluded party accrues per item or service. Many state Medicaid programs expect the same cadence. Monthly, documented against the dated files, is the defensible standard.
What does an excluded-anywhere screen mean?
It means one check resolves a party against the federal LEIE, SAM.gov, and every mirrored state Medicaid list at once, and flags a hit on any of them. A separate compromised-anywhere layer adds federal monitoring signals short of exclusion. Every match traces to its source file and snapshot date.

Go deeper

The other pillar guides

  • GuideHealthcare provider data
  • GuideProvider credentialing data
  • GuideHealthcare data for AI / RAG
START HERE

Screen your whole roster against every list — free.

Upload a roster and get a same-day screen across the OIG LEIE, SAM.gov, and the state Medicaid lists, with a signed attestation. No PHI, no demo.

Add Fonteum to your agent →Request pilot access

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily reconciliation

Published counts are reconciled against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Platform
Platform overviewAPIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots
Solutions
All solutionsExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & enrichmentAudit evidenceProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams
Data & sources
Coverage & sourcesBrowse all datasetsState Medicaid exclusionsFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareSanctionsOwnershipStaffingDeficienciesSpecial Focus Facilities
Developers
Developer hubDocsAPI referenceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrationsWebhooks
Research & guides
Research hubGuidesHealthcare provider dataExclusion & sanctions screeningProvider credentialing dataHealthcare data for AIHospital margin gapProvider access gapsGlossaryComparisonsCitationsWhy Fonteum
Company
AboutPressCustomersPricingContactEditorial policyCorrections
Trust & legal
TrustQualitySecurityPrivacy policyTerms of serviceMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

·hello@fonteum.com

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Request access→

The substrate, by the numbers

9.2Mgraph entitiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities
15.7Mlinked identifiersNPIs, CCNs, LEIs and more, resolved to entities
5Mgraph edgesSource-attested relationships between entities
44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
35dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
67reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures