Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

The capability layer

APIREST + bulk accessMCP serverCallable by AI agentsFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationSource-vs-source diffsEntity graphSnapshotsPoint-in-time, bitemporal

By use case

Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligence

By buyer

Compliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

The differentiator

Coverage & sourcesThe catalogFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareFacility qualityBrowse all datasets →
Research

The dev on-ramp

DocsAPI referenceMCPQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inTry the FHIR sandbox →Request access →

Platform

APIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots

Solutions

Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

Data

Coverage & sourcesFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareBrowse all datasets →
Research

Developers

DocsAPI referenceMCPQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inTry the FHIR sandbox →Request access →
Providers/Specialties/Urology

Provider directory · By specialty

Healthcare providers — Urology

CMS NPPES registration records for the Urology specialty — national supply, per-state distribution, and national MIPS quality context, with field-level provenance back to the federal source.

Source: CMS NPPES NPI Registry — supply by state·Snapshot: 2026-05-06·Method: nppes-supply-by-state/v2026.05·ID: nppes-supply/urology
14,748Active Urology providers (NPPES)As of 2026-05-06 · across all 50 states + DC
CaliforniaState with the most providers1,560 active providers
51States + DC coveredEvery jurisdiction in the NPPES supply file

14,748 active Urology providers are registered in the CMS NPPES NPI Registry across all 50 states and the District of Columbia, snapshotted 2026-05-06. The table below shows how that supply is distributed by state — both the raw active-provider count and the population-adjusted density (providers per 100,000 residents, U.S. Census PEP). Each record carries field-level provenance back to its federal source.

Urology providers by state

All 51 jurisdictions, ranked by active-provider count. Density rank is 1 = highest providers per 100,000 residents. Population denominators are U.S. Census Bureau PEP V2025 estimates.

Urology active provider supply by U.S. state, NPPES snapshot 2026-05-06
StateActive providersPer 100kDensity rank
California1,560437/51
New York1,1225.64/51
Florida1,0534.523/51
Texas1,0083.246/51
Pennsylvania6765.29/51
Illinois6425.112/51
Ohio5564.717/51
North Carolina5244.716/51
Michigan4644.621/51
New Jersey4514.715/51
Georgia3993.643/51
Massachusetts3875.45/51
Virginia3704.232/51
Washington3494.426/51
Indiana3114.524/51
Tennessee3064.230/51
Maryland3034.813/51
Minnesota2975.110/51
Arizona2863.840/51
Missouri2764.425/51
Wisconsin2704.522/51
Colorado2544.329/51
South Carolina2344.328/51
Louisiana2134.618/51
Oregon1964.619/51
Connecticut1935.37/51
Alabama1853.642/51
Kentucky1763.839/51
Oklahoma1603.938/51
Iowa1354.233/51
Kansas1254.231/51
Utah1123.248/51
Arkansas1013.345/51
Mississippi1003.444/51
Nebraska824.134/51
West Virginia814.620/51
Nevada772.451/51
New Hampshire755.36/51
Maine725.111/51
Rhode Island696.22/51
Idaho643.247/51
New Mexico622.949/51
Hawaii58435/51
Montana554.814/51
District of Columbia547.71/51
South Dakota485.28/51
Delaware42436/51
Vermont385.93/51
Alaska324.327/51
North Dakota303.841/51
Wyoming152.650/51
Source: CMS NPPES NPI Registry + U.S. Census PEP V2025·Snapshot: 2026-05-06·Method: nppes-supply-by-state/v2026.05·ID: nppes-supply/urology

Quality context: MIPS scores

Fonteum publishes the national CMS Quality Payment Program (QPP) MIPS score distribution. A per-specialty cross-tab is not yet available in the public QPP release, so the figures below are national across all participating clinicians — not specific to Urology.

83.06National mean MIPS scorePY2023 · all clinicians
85.5%High performers (score ≥ 75)477,137 clinicians scored
2.4%Penalty track (score < 18.75)Downward Medicare adjustment
A MIPS score reflects documentation and reporting completeness within the QPP program — not clinical outcomes. To look up an individual clinician’s MIPS score by NPI, use the MIPS score lookup. For the full national distribution and methodology, read the MIPS score distribution study (PY2023).
Source: CMS Quality Payment Program — MIPS individual scores (PY2023)·Snapshot: 2026-05-25·Method: qpp-mips/v1·ID: cms-qpp-mips
Sample provider records
  • NPI 1003000597 · TULSA, OK
  • NPI 1003002072 · HAMILTON, NJ
  • NPI 1003010893 · CARROLLTON, TX
  • NPI 1003012113 · SAINT CROIX FALLS, WI
  • NPI 1003013392 · GRAND RAPIDS, MI
  • NPI 1003014267 · NEW YORK, NY
  • NPI 1003025651 · OAK LAWN, IL
  • NPI 1003025875 · MEDFORD, OR
  • NPI 1003029372 · CORONADO, CA
  • NPI 1003029836 · LINWOOD, NJ
  • NPI 1003041377 · OLD FORGE, NY
  • NPI 1003041765 · BETHESDA, MD
  • NPI 1003051780 · SAN FRANCISCO, CA
  • NPI 1003055211 · CARY, NC
  • NPI 1003058546 · WOODBURY, MN
  • NPI 1003066580 · INDIANAPOLIS, IN
  • NPI 1003073883 · LOMA LINDA, CA
  • NPI 1003076753 · ROCHESTER, NY
  • NPI 1003078932 · SAINT ALBANS, VT
  • NPI 1003079047 · BALTIMORE, MD
  • NPI 1003079682 · ROSEVILLE, CA
  • NPI 1003083775 · SHELTER ISLAND, NY
  • NPI 1003084203 · NEW YORK, NY
  • NPI 1003085226 · TOLEDO, OH
  • NPI 1003086588 · MERIDIAN, ID
  • NPI 1003090382 · DENVER, CO
  • NPI 1003094889 · PUYALLUP, WA
  • NPI 1003108549 · ANNAPOLIS, MD
  • NPI 1003115684 · TAMPA, FL
  • NPI 1003127002 · LAREDO, TX
  • NPI 1003129651 · BATON ROUGE, LA
  • NPI 1003132549 · URBANA, IL
  • NPI 1003134701 · NEW YORK, NY
  • NPI 1003136565 · LONG BEACH, CA
  • NPI 1003136839 · BRAINERD, MN
  • NPI 1003158106 · HARTFORD, CT

Related

Other tracked specialties with live NPPES supply data, plus the underlying dataset and methodology.

  • Cardiology providers
  • Chiropractic providers
  • Dermatology providers
  • Gastroenterology providers
  • Neurology providers
  • Obstetrics & Gynecology providers

NPPES dataset · Methodology · Browse providers by state · Provider access-gap tool

Frequently asked questions

How many Urology providers are there in the United States?

Fonteum tracks the active Urology providers registered in the CMS NPPES NPI Registry across all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The national total and per-state breakdown are shown in the distribution table on this page, sourced from the NPPES supply file.

Which states have the most Urology providers?

By active-provider count, the states with the most Urology providers are California, New York, Florida. California has the most (1,560 active providers). Full per-state counts are in the distribution table above.

Where are Urology providers most scarce relative to population?

Adjusted for population (providers per 100,000 residents, U.S. Census PEP), Nevada, Wyoming, New Mexico have the lowest Urology provider density in the current snapshot. Density rank is shown for every state in the table above.

Does Fonteum report MIPS quality scores for Urology?

Fonteum publishes the national CMS Quality Payment Program MIPS score distribution (mean 83.06, 85.5% of clinicians scored at or above the high-performer threshold of 75). A per-specialty cross-tab is not yet available in the public QPP release, so these figures are national rather than specific to Urology. Individual clinician scores can be looked up by NPI with the MIPS score lookup tool.

What does "active provider" mean in this data?

An active provider is an NPI record in the CMS NPPES NPI Registry whose primary taxonomy classifies it under the Urology specialty, in the snapshot Fonteum ingested. The count reflects registered providers, not practicing headcount or facility affiliations.

Where does this Urology provider data come from?

Provider counts come from the CMS National Provider Identifier (NPPES) registry; population denominators for the per-100k density come from the U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP V2025). Every figure carries field-level provenance back to its federal source. See the methodology page and the NPPES dataset page for full detail.

The substrate, by the numbers

44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
35dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
65reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily reconciliation

Published counts are reconciled against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Platform
Platform overviewAPIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots
Solutions
All solutionsExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & enrichmentAudit evidenceProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams
Data & sources
Coverage & sourcesBrowse all datasetsState Medicaid exclusionsFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareSanctionsOwnershipStaffingDeficienciesSpecial Focus Facilities
Developers
Developer hubDocsAPI referenceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrationsWebhooks
Research
Research hubHospital margin gapProvider access gapsGlossaryComparisonsCitationsWhy Fonteum
Company
AboutPressCustomersPricingContactEditorial policyCorrections
Trust & legal
TrustQualitySecurityPrivacy policyTerms of serviceMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

·hello@fonteum.com

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Request access→