Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

The capability layer

APIREST + bulk accessMCP serverCallable by AI agentsFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationSource-vs-source diffsEntity graphSnapshotsPoint-in-time, bitemporal

By use case

Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligence

By buyer

Compliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

The differentiator

Coverage & sourcesThe catalogFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareFacility qualityBrowse all datasets →
Research

The dev on-ramp

DocsAPI referenceMCPQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inTry the FHIR sandbox →Request access →

Platform

APIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots

Solutions

Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

Data

Coverage & sourcesFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareBrowse all datasets →
Research

Developers

DocsAPI referenceMCPQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inTry the FHIR sandbox →Request access →
Providers/Specialties/Plastic Surgery

Provider directory · By specialty

Healthcare providers — Plastic Surgery

CMS NPPES registration records for the Plastic Surgery specialty — national supply, per-state distribution, and national MIPS quality context, with field-level provenance back to the federal source.

Source: CMS NPPES NPI Registry — supply by state·Snapshot: 2026-05-07·Method: nppes-supply-by-state/v2026.05·ID: nppes-supply/plastic-surgery
6,712Active Plastic Surgery providers (NPPES)As of 2026-05-07 · across all 50 states + DC
CaliforniaState with the most providers1,007 active providers
51States + DC coveredEvery jurisdiction in the NPPES supply file

6,712 active Plastic Surgery providers are registered in the CMS NPPES NPI Registry across all 50 states and the District of Columbia, snapshotted 2026-05-07. The table below shows how that supply is distributed by state — both the raw active-provider count and the population-adjusted density (providers per 100,000 residents, U.S. Census PEP). Each record carries field-level provenance back to its federal source.

Plastic Surgery providers by state

All 51 jurisdictions, ranked by active-provider count. Density rank is 1 = highest providers per 100,000 residents. Population denominators are U.S. Census Bureau PEP V2025 estimates.

Plastic Surgery active provider supply by U.S. state, NPPES snapshot 2026-05-07
StateActive providersPer 100kDensity rank
California1,0072.66/51
Florida6122.63/51
New York5142.64/51
Texas4991.631/51
Ohio2672.28/51
Pennsylvania256217/51
Illinois253216/51
New Jersey2122.29/51
Michigan2102.112/51
Georgia2041.822/51
North Carolina1651.535/51
Virginia1641.920/51
Massachusetts1582.211/51
Arizona155214/51
Maryland1292.113/51
Minnesota1292.210/51
Washington1191.533/51
Tennessee1181.630/51
Colorado1161.918/51
Missouri1121.823/51
Wisconsin1021.726/51
Indiana961.440/51
Utah902.65/51
Connecticut892.47/51
South Carolina771.438/51
Kentucky751.629/51
Oregon731.727/51
Louisiana661.436/51
Kansas531.824/51
Nevada511.632/51
Alabama50149/51
Oklahoma461.145/51
Mississippi441.534/51
District of Columbia4261/51
Iowa401.242/51
Arkansas351.144/51
Rhode Island353.12/51
New Mexico291.441/51
West Virginia291.628/51
Nebraska281.439/51
Hawaii271.919/51
New Hampshire261.821/51
Idaho20148/51
Delaware181.725/51
North Dakota16215/51
Maine151.146/51
South Dakota131.437/51
Montana121.147/51
Alaska91.243/51
Vermont60.950/51
Wyoming10.251/51
Source: CMS NPPES NPI Registry + U.S. Census PEP V2025·Snapshot: 2026-05-07·Method: nppes-supply-by-state/v2026.05·ID: nppes-supply/plastic-surgery

Quality context: MIPS scores

Fonteum publishes the national CMS Quality Payment Program (QPP) MIPS score distribution. A per-specialty cross-tab is not yet available in the public QPP release, so the figures below are national across all participating clinicians — not specific to Plastic Surgery.

83.06National mean MIPS scorePY2023 · all clinicians
85.5%High performers (score ≥ 75)477,137 clinicians scored
2.4%Penalty track (score < 18.75)Downward Medicare adjustment
A MIPS score reflects documentation and reporting completeness within the QPP program — not clinical outcomes. To look up an individual clinician’s MIPS score by NPI, use the MIPS score lookup. For the full national distribution and methodology, read the MIPS score distribution study (PY2023).
Source: CMS Quality Payment Program — MIPS individual scores (PY2023)·Snapshot: 2026-05-25·Method: qpp-mips/v1·ID: cms-qpp-mips
Sample provider records
  • NPI 1003006602 · LAUREL, MS
  • NPI 1003016205 · WARREN, OH
  • NPI 1003078338 · SANTA MONICA, CA
  • NPI 1003079435 · CATONSVILLE, MD
  • NPI 1003080201 · NEW ORLEANS, LA
  • NPI 1003090267 · CONCORD, CA
  • NPI 1003099045 · NORTH BETHESDA, MD
  • NPI 1003127572 · TIBURON, CA
  • NPI 1003131053 · NEW YORK, NY
  • NPI 1003179300 · RENTON, WA
  • NPI 1003202888 · DALLAS, TX
  • NPI 1003220948 · OMAHA, NE
  • NPI 1003227273 · SEATTLE, WA
  • NPI 1003252727 · BOSTON, MA
  • NPI 1003266354 · PHOENIX, AZ
  • NPI 1003278102 · SAN FRANCISCO, CA
  • NPI 1003306135 · AUGUSTA, GA
  • NPI 1003339649 · AUSTIN, TX
  • NPI 1003348772 · WILMINGTON, NC
  • NPI 1003465493 · BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI
  • NPI 1003497694 · SAN DIEGO, CA
  • NPI 1003506007 · OMAHA, NE
  • NPI 1003802430 · GRAND FORKS, ND
  • NPI 1003805417 · LAKE OSWEGO, OR
  • NPI 1003810425 · GRAND RAPIDS, MI
  • NPI 1003811233 · WOODBURY, NJ
  • NPI 1003814062 · WASHINGTON, DC
  • NPI 1003820366 · NEW YORK, NY
  • NPI 1003823139 · WEBSTER, TX
  • NPI 1003826033 · LUTHERVILLE, MD
  • NPI 1003831488 · ANCHORAGE, AK
  • NPI 1003832197 · MIAMI, FL
  • NPI 1003834318 · SAN CLEMENTE, CA
  • NPI 1003842170 · READING, PA
  • NPI 1003844085 · SARASOTA, FL
  • NPI 1003854837 · SCHENECTADY, NY

Related

Other tracked specialties with live NPPES supply data, plus the underlying dataset and methodology.

  • Cardiology providers
  • Chiropractic providers
  • Dermatology providers
  • Gastroenterology providers
  • Neurology providers
  • Obstetrics & Gynecology providers

NPPES dataset · Methodology · Browse providers by state · Provider access-gap tool

Frequently asked questions

How many Plastic Surgery providers are there in the United States?

Fonteum tracks the active Plastic Surgery providers registered in the CMS NPPES NPI Registry across all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The national total and per-state breakdown are shown in the distribution table on this page, sourced from the NPPES supply file.

Which states have the most Plastic Surgery providers?

By active-provider count, the states with the most Plastic Surgery providers are California, Florida, New York. California has the most (1,007 active providers). Full per-state counts are in the distribution table above.

Where are Plastic Surgery providers most scarce relative to population?

Adjusted for population (providers per 100,000 residents, U.S. Census PEP), Wyoming, Vermont, Alabama have the lowest Plastic Surgery provider density in the current snapshot. Density rank is shown for every state in the table above.

Does Fonteum report MIPS quality scores for Plastic Surgery?

Fonteum publishes the national CMS Quality Payment Program MIPS score distribution (mean 83.06, 85.5% of clinicians scored at or above the high-performer threshold of 75). A per-specialty cross-tab is not yet available in the public QPP release, so these figures are national rather than specific to Plastic Surgery. Individual clinician scores can be looked up by NPI with the MIPS score lookup tool.

What does "active provider" mean in this data?

An active provider is an NPI record in the CMS NPPES NPI Registry whose primary taxonomy classifies it under the Plastic Surgery specialty, in the snapshot Fonteum ingested. The count reflects registered providers, not practicing headcount or facility affiliations.

Where does this Plastic Surgery provider data come from?

Provider counts come from the CMS National Provider Identifier (NPPES) registry; population denominators for the per-100k density come from the U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP V2025). Every figure carries field-level provenance back to its federal source. See the methodology page and the NPPES dataset page for full detail.

The substrate, by the numbers

44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
35dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
65reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily reconciliation

Published counts are reconciled against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Platform
Platform overviewAPIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots
Solutions
All solutionsExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & enrichmentAudit evidenceProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams
Data & sources
Coverage & sourcesBrowse all datasetsState Medicaid exclusionsFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareSanctionsOwnershipStaffingDeficienciesSpecial Focus Facilities
Developers
Developer hubDocsAPI referenceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrationsWebhooks
Research
Research hubHospital margin gapProvider access gapsGlossaryComparisonsCitationsWhy Fonteum
Company
AboutPressCustomersPricingContactEditorial policyCorrections
Trust & legal
TrustQualitySecurityPrivacy policyTerms of serviceMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

·hello@fonteum.com

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Request access→