Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

The capability layer

APIREST + bulk accessMCP serverCallable by AI agentsFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationSource-vs-source diffsEntity graphSnapshotsPoint-in-time, bitemporal

By use case

Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligence

By buyer

Compliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

The differentiator

Coverage & sourcesThe catalogFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareFacility qualityBrowse all datasets →
Research

The dev on-ramp

DocsAPI referenceMCPQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inTry the FHIR sandbox →Request access →

Platform

APIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots

Solutions

Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

Data

Coverage & sourcesFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareBrowse all datasets →
Research

Developers

DocsAPI referenceMCPQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inTry the FHIR sandbox →Request access →
Providers/Specialties/Ophthalmology

Provider directory · By specialty

Healthcare providers — Ophthalmology

CMS NPPES registration records for the Ophthalmology specialty — national supply, per-state distribution, and national MIPS quality context, with field-level provenance back to the federal source.

Source: CMS NPPES NPI Registry — supply by state·Snapshot: 2026-05-06·Method: nppes-supply-by-state/v2026.05·ID: nppes-supply/ophthalmology
24,811Active Ophthalmology providers (NPPES)As of 2026-05-06 · across all 50 states + DC
CaliforniaState with the most providers3,197 active providers
51States + DC coveredEvery jurisdiction in the NPPES supply file

24,811 active Ophthalmology providers are registered in the CMS NPPES NPI Registry across all 50 states and the District of Columbia, snapshotted 2026-05-06. The table below shows how that supply is distributed by state — both the raw active-provider count and the population-adjusted density (providers per 100,000 residents, U.S. Census PEP). Each record carries field-level provenance back to its federal source.

Ophthalmology providers by state

All 51 jurisdictions, ranked by active-provider count. Density rank is 1 = highest providers per 100,000 residents. Population denominators are U.S. Census Bureau PEP V2025 estimates.

Ophthalmology active provider supply by U.S. state, NPPES snapshot 2026-05-06
StateActive providersPer 100kDensity rank
California3,1978.112/51
New York1,9559.85/51
Florida1,7767.617/51
Texas1,7075.541/51
Pennsylvania1,1608.98/51
Illinois1,0007.915/51
Michigan8558.410/51
Ohio8457.124/51
Massachusetts82611.62/51
North Carolina7286.627/51
New Jersey6797.123/51
Maryland64810.33/51
Virginia6477.321/51
Georgia5965.344/51
Washington5526.925/51
Wisconsin4727.914/51
Minnesota466813/51
Colorado4497.518/51
Tennessee4225.839/51
Arizona4135.442/51
Oregon4069.57/51
Connecticut37210.14/51
Missouri372637/51
South Carolina3546.528/51
Louisiana3457.520/51
Indiana3414.947/51
Kentucky2806.132/51
Alabama259546/51
Oklahoma245636/51
Iowa2347.222/51
Utah2256.429/51
Kansas1806.133/51
Mississippi1695.740/51
Nevada1594.949/51
Arkansas1514.948/51
Hawaii1399.66/51
Nebraska120635/51
New Mexico1135.345/51
West Virginia1096.231/51
Maine1087.716/51
New Hampshire1067.519/51
District of Columbia9513.51/51
Rhode Island938.411/51
Idaho864.350/51
Delaware676.430/51
Montana675.938/51
South Dakota626.726/51
Vermont578.89/51
North Dakota48634/51
Alaska405.443/51
Wyoming162.751/51
Source: CMS NPPES NPI Registry + U.S. Census PEP V2025·Snapshot: 2026-05-06·Method: nppes-supply-by-state/v2026.05·ID: nppes-supply/ophthalmology

Quality context: MIPS scores

Fonteum publishes the national CMS Quality Payment Program (QPP) MIPS score distribution. A per-specialty cross-tab is not yet available in the public QPP release, so the figures below are national across all participating clinicians — not specific to Ophthalmology.

83.06National mean MIPS scorePY2023 · all clinicians
85.5%High performers (score ≥ 75)477,137 clinicians scored
2.4%Penalty track (score < 18.75)Downward Medicare adjustment
A MIPS score reflects documentation and reporting completeness within the QPP program — not clinical outcomes. To look up an individual clinician’s MIPS score by NPI, use the MIPS score lookup. For the full national distribution and methodology, read the MIPS score distribution study (PY2023).
Source: CMS Quality Payment Program — MIPS individual scores (PY2023)·Snapshot: 2026-05-25·Method: qpp-mips/v1·ID: cms-qpp-mips
Sample provider records
  • NPI 1003004540 · WELLINGTON, FL
  • NPI 1003007816 · SILVER SPRING, MD
  • NPI 1003013533 · NEW YORK, NY
  • NPI 1003013970 · GREENWOOD, SC
  • NPI 1003015785 · BRONX, NY
  • NPI 1003016916 · SAINT JOSEPH, MI
  • NPI 1003017468 · AUGUSTA, GA
  • NPI 1003018102 · WILLIAMSVILLE, NY
  • NPI 1003019092 · AUSTIN, TX
  • NPI 1003020223 · SONOMA, CA
  • NPI 1003028580 · SAN FRANCISCO, CA
  • NPI 1003029026 · CLEVELAND, OH
  • NPI 1003033689 · LITTLE SILVER, NJ
  • NPI 1003034034 · VOORHEES, NJ
  • NPI 1003034042 · NEW HAVEN, CT
  • NPI 1003034927 · JENKS, OK
  • NPI 1003040262 · OKLAHOMA CITY, OK
  • NPI 1003044058 · FREDERICKSBURG, TX
  • NPI 1003045170 · MIAMI, FL
  • NPI 1003046830 · FRISCO, TX
  • NPI 1003052788 · WALTHAM, MA
  • NPI 1003056516 · TORRANCE, CA
  • NPI 1003058652 · PLATTSBURGH, NY
  • NPI 1003064577 · COEUR D ALENE, ID
  • NPI 1003072018 · PHOENIX, AZ
  • NPI 1003072786 · LOS ANGELES, CA
  • NPI 1003075094 · EL PASO, TX
  • NPI 1003077033 · JONESBORO, GA
  • NPI 1003077942 · BERMUDA RUN, NC
  • NPI 1003077975 · HERSHEY, PA
  • NPI 1003077991 · NEW YORK, NY
  • NPI 1003078726 · BLUE ASH, OH
  • NPI 1003085093 · MC LEAN, VA
  • NPI 1003085481 · SAN DIEGO, CA
  • NPI 1003093774 · COLUMBUS, OH
  • NPI 1003096462 · SEATTLE, WA

Related

Other tracked specialties with live NPPES supply data, plus the underlying dataset and methodology.

  • Cardiology providers
  • Chiropractic providers
  • Dermatology providers
  • Gastroenterology providers
  • Neurology providers
  • Obstetrics & Gynecology providers

NPPES dataset · Methodology · Browse providers by state · Provider access-gap tool

Frequently asked questions

How many Ophthalmology providers are there in the United States?

Fonteum tracks the active Ophthalmology providers registered in the CMS NPPES NPI Registry across all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The national total and per-state breakdown are shown in the distribution table on this page, sourced from the NPPES supply file.

Which states have the most Ophthalmology providers?

By active-provider count, the states with the most Ophthalmology providers are California, New York, Florida. California has the most (3,197 active providers). Full per-state counts are in the distribution table above.

Where are Ophthalmology providers most scarce relative to population?

Adjusted for population (providers per 100,000 residents, U.S. Census PEP), Wyoming, Idaho, Nevada have the lowest Ophthalmology provider density in the current snapshot. Density rank is shown for every state in the table above.

Does Fonteum report MIPS quality scores for Ophthalmology?

Fonteum publishes the national CMS Quality Payment Program MIPS score distribution (mean 83.06, 85.5% of clinicians scored at or above the high-performer threshold of 75). A per-specialty cross-tab is not yet available in the public QPP release, so these figures are national rather than specific to Ophthalmology. Individual clinician scores can be looked up by NPI with the MIPS score lookup tool.

What does "active provider" mean in this data?

An active provider is an NPI record in the CMS NPPES NPI Registry whose primary taxonomy classifies it under the Ophthalmology specialty, in the snapshot Fonteum ingested. The count reflects registered providers, not practicing headcount or facility affiliations.

Where does this Ophthalmology provider data come from?

Provider counts come from the CMS National Provider Identifier (NPPES) registry; population denominators for the per-100k density come from the U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP V2025). Every figure carries field-level provenance back to its federal source. See the methodology page and the NPPES dataset page for full detail.

The substrate, by the numbers

44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
35dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
65reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily reconciliation

Published counts are reconciled against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Platform
Platform overviewAPIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots
Solutions
All solutionsExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & enrichmentAudit evidenceProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams
Data & sources
Coverage & sourcesBrowse all datasetsState Medicaid exclusionsFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareSanctionsOwnershipStaffingDeficienciesSpecial Focus Facilities
Developers
Developer hubDocsAPI referenceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrationsWebhooks
Research
Research hubHospital margin gapProvider access gapsGlossaryComparisonsCitationsWhy Fonteum
Company
AboutPressCustomersPricingContactEditorial policyCorrections
Trust & legal
TrustQualitySecurityPrivacy policyTerms of serviceMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

·hello@fonteum.com

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Request access→