Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

The capability layer

APIREST + bulk accessMCP serverCallable by AI agentsFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationSource-vs-source diffsEntity graphSnapshotsPoint-in-time, bitemporal

By use case

Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligence

By buyer

Compliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

The differentiator

Coverage & sourcesThe catalogFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareFacility qualityBrowse all datasets →
Research

The dev on-ramp

DocsAPI referenceMCPQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inTry the FHIR sandbox →Request access →

Platform

APIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots

Solutions

Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

Data

Coverage & sourcesFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareBrowse all datasets →
Research

Developers

DocsAPI referenceMCPQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inTry the FHIR sandbox →Request access →
Providers/Specialties/Oncology (Medical)

Provider directory · By specialty

Healthcare providers — Oncology (Medical)

CMS NPPES registration records for the Oncology (Medical) specialty — national supply, per-state distribution, and national MIPS quality context, with field-level provenance back to the federal source.

Source: CMS NPPES NPI Registry — supply by state·Snapshot: 2026-05-06·Method: nppes-supply-by-state/v2026.05·ID: nppes-supply/oncology
7,286Active Oncology (Medical) providers (NPPES)As of 2026-05-06 · across all 50 states + DC
TexasState with the most providers736 active providers
51States + DC coveredEvery jurisdiction in the NPPES supply file

7,286 active Oncology (Medical) providers are registered in the CMS NPPES NPI Registry across all 50 states and the District of Columbia, snapshotted 2026-05-06. The table below shows how that supply is distributed by state — both the raw active-provider count and the population-adjusted density (providers per 100,000 residents, U.S. Census PEP). Each record carries field-level provenance back to its federal source.

Oncology (Medical) providers by state

All 51 jurisdictions, ranked by active-provider count. Density rank is 1 = highest providers per 100,000 residents. Population denominators are U.S. Census Bureau PEP V2025 estimates.

Oncology (Medical) active provider supply by U.S. state, NPPES snapshot 2026-05-06
StateActive providersPer 100kDensity rank
Texas7362.415/51
New York6493.35/51
Florida6392.711/51
California6191.631/51
Massachusetts4466.21/51
Pennsylvania3402.613/51
North Carolina2872.614/51
Maryland2564.13/51
Ohio232224/51
Michigan2252.216/51
Washington2212.810/51
Illinois2161.727/51
New Jersey1841.925/51
Minnesota1813.17/51
Missouri1742.88/51
Virginia1481.728/51
Indiana1432.119/51
Tennessee143223/51
Connecticut1263.44/51
Colorado122221/51
Oregon1192.89/51
Georgia113140/51
Wisconsin991.729/51
Arizona881.236/51
Kentucky811.826/51
Iowa702.217/51
Utah551.632/51
Alabama51141/51
South Carolina420.845/51
Kansas391.333/51
New Hampshire382.712/51
Arkansas341.137/51
District of Columbia334.72/51
Louisiana330.747/51
Idaho321.630/51
Maine292.120/51
New Mexico261.235/51
Nevada260.844/51
Oklahoma250.648/51
Delaware222.118/51
Mississippi220.746/51
Vermont213.26/51
Nebraska180.943/51
West Virginia18139/51
North Dakota16222/51
Hawaii14142/51
Montana141.234/51
Rhode Island121.138/51
South Dakota40.449/51
Alaska30.450/51
Wyoming20.351/51
Source: CMS NPPES NPI Registry + U.S. Census PEP V2025·Snapshot: 2026-05-06·Method: nppes-supply-by-state/v2026.05·ID: nppes-supply/oncology

Quality context: MIPS scores

Fonteum publishes the national CMS Quality Payment Program (QPP) MIPS score distribution. A per-specialty cross-tab is not yet available in the public QPP release, so the figures below are national across all participating clinicians — not specific to Oncology (Medical).

83.06National mean MIPS scorePY2023 · all clinicians
85.5%High performers (score ≥ 75)477,137 clinicians scored
2.4%Penalty track (score < 18.75)Downward Medicare adjustment
A MIPS score reflects documentation and reporting completeness within the QPP program — not clinical outcomes. To look up an individual clinician’s MIPS score by NPI, use the MIPS score lookup. For the full national distribution and methodology, read the MIPS score distribution study (PY2023).
Source: CMS Quality Payment Program — MIPS individual scores (PY2023)·Snapshot: 2026-05-25·Method: qpp-mips/v1·ID: cms-qpp-mips
Sample provider records
  • NPI 1003020413 · SANFORD, ME
  • NPI 1003031212 · SARASOTA, FL
  • NPI 1003057654 · LOS ANGELES, CA
  • NPI 1003075490 · GASTONIA, NC
  • NPI 1003076795 · OAK LAWN, IL
  • NPI 1003080854 · LITTLE ROCK, AR
  • NPI 1003087768 · CHICAGO, IL
  • NPI 1003089814 · ANKENY, IA
  • NPI 1003099813 · HOUSTON, TX
  • NPI 1003128703 · WINTER PARK, FL
  • NPI 1003131640 · KENNEWICK, WA
  • NPI 1003159054 · HOUSTON, TX
  • NPI 1003164427 · MIAMI, FL
  • NPI 1003166042 · NEW YORK, NY
  • NPI 1003171091 · FORT WORTH, TX
  • NPI 1003171976 · SEATTLE, WA
  • NPI 1003201435 · NEW YORK, NY
  • NPI 1003253360 · BALTIMORE, MD
  • NPI 1003258583 · NORTH MIAMI BEACH, FL
  • NPI 1003259045 · DETROIT, MI
  • NPI 1003263732 · MCALLEN, TX
  • NPI 1003269085 · TARBORO, NC
  • NPI 1003313800 · NEW YORK, NY
  • NPI 1003344037 · BOSTON, MA
  • NPI 1003376468 · ROCHESTER, MN
  • NPI 1003478421 · KINGSPORT, TN
  • NPI 1003803685 · VICTORVILLE, CA
  • NPI 1003804485 · FLEMING ISLAND, FL
  • NPI 1003805409 · GRAND RAPIDS, MI
  • NPI 1003807645 · SARASOTA, FL
  • NPI 1003809435 · OVIEDO, FL
  • NPI 1003810847 · YOUNGSTOWN, OH
  • NPI 1003824210 · FAIRFAX, VA
  • NPI 1003827486 · DUARTE, CA
  • NPI 1003831140 · CLEMMONS, NC
  • NPI 1003834920 · SPRINGFIELD, MA

Related

Other tracked specialties with live NPPES supply data, plus the underlying dataset and methodology.

  • Cardiology providers
  • Chiropractic providers
  • Dermatology providers
  • Gastroenterology providers
  • Neurology providers
  • Obstetrics & Gynecology providers

NPPES dataset · Methodology · Browse providers by state · Provider access-gap tool

Frequently asked questions

How many Oncology (Medical) providers are there in the United States?

Fonteum tracks the active Oncology (Medical) providers registered in the CMS NPPES NPI Registry across all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The national total and per-state breakdown are shown in the distribution table on this page, sourced from the NPPES supply file.

Which states have the most Oncology (Medical) providers?

By active-provider count, the states with the most Oncology (Medical) providers are Texas, New York, Florida. Texas has the most (736 active providers). Full per-state counts are in the distribution table above.

Where are Oncology (Medical) providers most scarce relative to population?

Adjusted for population (providers per 100,000 residents, U.S. Census PEP), Wyoming, Alaska, South Dakota have the lowest Oncology (Medical) provider density in the current snapshot. Density rank is shown for every state in the table above.

Does Fonteum report MIPS quality scores for Oncology (Medical)?

Fonteum publishes the national CMS Quality Payment Program MIPS score distribution (mean 83.06, 85.5% of clinicians scored at or above the high-performer threshold of 75). A per-specialty cross-tab is not yet available in the public QPP release, so these figures are national rather than specific to Oncology (Medical). Individual clinician scores can be looked up by NPI with the MIPS score lookup tool.

What does "active provider" mean in this data?

An active provider is an NPI record in the CMS NPPES NPI Registry whose primary taxonomy classifies it under the Oncology (Medical) specialty, in the snapshot Fonteum ingested. The count reflects registered providers, not practicing headcount or facility affiliations.

Where does this Oncology (Medical) provider data come from?

Provider counts come from the CMS National Provider Identifier (NPPES) registry; population denominators for the per-100k density come from the U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP V2025). Every figure carries field-level provenance back to its federal source. See the methodology page and the NPPES dataset page for full detail.

The substrate, by the numbers

44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
35dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
65reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily reconciliation

Published counts are reconciled against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Platform
Platform overviewAPIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots
Solutions
All solutionsExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & enrichmentAudit evidenceProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams
Data & sources
Coverage & sourcesBrowse all datasetsState Medicaid exclusionsFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareSanctionsOwnershipStaffingDeficienciesSpecial Focus Facilities
Developers
Developer hubDocsAPI referenceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrationsWebhooks
Research
Research hubHospital margin gapProvider access gapsGlossaryComparisonsCitationsWhy Fonteum
Company
AboutPressCustomersPricingContactEditorial policyCorrections
Trust & legal
TrustQualitySecurityPrivacy policyTerms of serviceMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

·hello@fonteum.com

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Request access→