Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

The capability layer

APIREST + bulk accessMCP serverCallable by AI agentsFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationSource-vs-source diffsEntity graphSnapshotsPoint-in-time, bitemporal

By use case

Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligence

By buyer

Compliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

The differentiator

Coverage & sourcesThe catalogFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareFacility qualityBrowse all datasets →
Research

The dev on-ramp

DocsAPI referenceMCPQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inTry the FHIR sandbox →Request access →

Platform

APIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots

Solutions

Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

Data

Coverage & sourcesFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareBrowse all datasets →
Research

Developers

DocsAPI referenceMCPQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inTry the FHIR sandbox →Request access →
Fonteum Care Compare · Wisconsin

Wisconsin ambulatory surgical centers: 80 Medicare-certified, ASC quality measures with NPI bridge.

Per-facility ASC-1 through ASC-12 quality measures with deterministic NPI bridge (100.0% NPI coverage in Wisconsin) — the only Care Compare facility type with a usable provider-identity join key.

Cross-check at Medicare.gov →All states →
Snapshot May 7, 2026·80 Medicare-certified ASCs in Wisconsin · 100.0% with NPI·CMS Care Compare — ASC Quality (4jcv-atw7)·Module overview →·Methodology →·Audit Pack →
Source-modified 2025-12-16 · Reporting year 2024 · ASC-12 hospital-visit follow-up rates suppressed for facilities below volume threshold

ASC-12 performance breakdown — Wisconsin

ASC-12 measures hospital-visit rate within 7 days of outpatient surgery. CMS-published performance categories on facilities meeting the volume threshold.

N/A
50
No Different Than the National Rate
29
Worse Than the National Rate
1

ASC-1 through ASC-11 quality measures — Wisconsin state means

Each row is the mean CMS-published rate across Wisconsinfacilities that meet the measure’s reporting threshold. Lower is better for adverse-event measures; higher is better for the prophylactic-antibiotic process measure. Facilities CMS suppressed for low case volume are excluded from the mean, not counted as zero.

MeasureDirectionState meanFacilities reporting
Patient burn rateLower is better0.01%51
Unplanned hospital transfer/admissionLower is better0.02%56
Wrong site, side, patient, or procedureLower is better0.00%51
All-cause hospital readmission rateLower is better0.11%61
Appropriate prophylactic antibiotic useHigher is better93.08%26

Highest-volume ASCs — Wisconsin

Top 25 by ASC-12 reportable case volume (a procedural-volume signal, not a quality measure).

FacilityCityASC-12 casesCategory
Ssm health surgerydigestive health ctr on park stMADISON3613Worse Than the National Rate
Gastrointestinal associates endoscopy centerWAUSAU1761No Different Than the National Rate
Gi specialists llcWAUKESHA1710No Different Than the National Rate
Lake country endoscopy center llcOCONOMOWOC1107No Different Than the National Rate
East mequon surgery center llcMEQUON1098No Different Than the National Rate
Mayfair digestive health center llcWAUWATOSA1066No Different Than the National Rate
West bend surgery center llcWEST BEND900No Different Than the National Rate
Aurora surgery centersGREENFIELD768No Different Than the National Rate
Bellin health marinette surgery centerMARINETTE762No Different Than the National Rate
Menomonee falls ambulatory surgery centerMENOMONEE FALLS632No Different Than the National Rate
Southern lakes endoscopy centerMILWAUKEE604No Different Than the National Rate
Center for digestive health ltdMILWAUKEE572No Different Than the National Rate
Racine digestive health center llcSTURTEVANT535No Different Than the National Rate
Froedtert surgery center llcMILWAUKEE466No Different Than the National Rate
St vincent hospital hospital sisters third order of st francis dba prevea surgery centerGREEN BAY462No Different Than the National Rate
Aurora surgery centers llcGERMANTOWN441No Different Than the National Rate
Gastrointestinal associates endoscopy center llcSTEVENS POINT431No Different Than the National Rate
Wisconsin digestive health centerWEST ALLIS340No Different Than the National Rate
Mchs hospitals inc dba marshfield clinic wausau ascWAUSAU326No Different Than the National Rate
Marshfield clinic incMARSHFIELD311No Different Than the National Rate
Marshfield clinic minocquaMINOCQUA311No Different Than the National Rate
Marshfield clinic eau claireEAU CLAIRE311No Different Than the National Rate
Kenosha digestive health centerKENOSHA280No Different Than the National Rate
Valley surgery center llcHUDSON266No Different Than the National Rate
Pine ridge surgery centerWAUSAU232No Different Than the National Rate

Wisconsin ambulatory surgical centers — FAQ

How many ambulatory surgical centers are Medicare-certified in Wisconsin?
80 Medicare-certified ambulatory surgical centers operate in Wisconsin as of the CMS Care Compare ASC Quality snapshot (2026-05-07). Every facility carries a National Provider Identifier — ASCs are the only Care Compare facility type with a 100% deterministic NPI bridge.
What ASC quality measures does Wisconsin report?
CMS publishes ASC-1 through ASC-12. This page aggregates the state mean for the per-facility rate measures that have at least one reporting facility in Wisconsin, plus the ASC-12 colonoscopy follow-up performance category. Measures are CMS-published rates: lower is better for adverse-event measures (burns, transfers, wrong-site events, readmissions, cataract complications) and higher is better for appropriate prophylactic antibiotic use.
Why are some facilities missing a quality rate?
CMS suppresses a measure when a facility falls below the minimum case volume for that measure in the reporting window. Suppressed facilities are excluded from each state mean rather than counted as zero, so the averages reflect only facilities CMS actually scored.
Where does this ASC data come from and how current is it?
All columns trace to the CMS Care Compare Ambulatory Surgical Center Quality dataset (PDC 4jcv-atw7), source-modified 2025-12-16. Fonteum redistributes the public-domain CMS file without alteration and links every row to its provenance record; cross-check any facility at Medicare.gov.

Compare other facility types

Every Fonteum Care Compare module carries the same per-facility provenance for Wisconsin and the rest of the country.

Nursing homesHome healthHospiceDialysisHospitalsAll modules

Compliance posture

Methodology · Corrections log · Editorial policy

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily reconciliation

Published counts are reconciled against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Platform
Platform overviewAPIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots
Solutions
All solutionsExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & enrichmentAudit evidenceProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams
Data & sources
Coverage & sourcesBrowse all datasetsState Medicaid exclusionsFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareSanctionsOwnershipStaffingDeficienciesSpecial Focus Facilities
Developers
Developer hubDocsAPI referenceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrationsWebhooks
Research
Research hubHospital margin gapProvider access gapsGlossaryComparisonsCitationsWhy Fonteum
Company
AboutPressCustomersPricingContactEditorial policyCorrections
Trust & legal
TrustQualitySecurityPrivacy policyTerms of serviceMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

·hello@fonteum.com

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Request access→

The substrate, by the numbers

44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
35dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
65reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures