Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

The capability layer

APIREST + bulk accessMCP serverCallable by AI agentsFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationSource-vs-source diffsEntity graphSnapshotsPoint-in-time, bitemporal

By use case

Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligence

By buyer

Compliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

The differentiator

Coverage & sourcesThe catalogFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareFacility qualityBrowse all datasets →
Research

The dev on-ramp

DocsAPI referenceMCPQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inTry the FHIR sandbox →Request access →

Platform

APIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots

Solutions

Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

Data

Coverage & sourcesFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareBrowse all datasets →
Research

Developers

DocsAPI referenceMCPQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inTry the FHIR sandbox →Request access →
Fonteum Care Compare · Washington

Washington ambulatory surgical centers: 163 Medicare-certified, ASC quality measures with NPI bridge.

Per-facility ASC-1 through ASC-12 quality measures with deterministic NPI bridge (100.0% NPI coverage in Washington) — the only Care Compare facility type with a usable provider-identity join key.

Cross-check at Medicare.gov →All states →
Snapshot May 7, 2026·163 Medicare-certified ASCs in Washington · 100.0% with NPI·CMS Care Compare — ASC Quality (4jcv-atw7)·Module overview →·Methodology →·Audit Pack →
Source-modified 2025-12-16 · Reporting year 2024 · ASC-12 hospital-visit follow-up rates suppressed for facilities below volume threshold

ASC-12 performance breakdown — Washington

ASC-12 measures hospital-visit rate within 7 days of outpatient surgery. CMS-published performance categories on facilities meeting the volume threshold.

N/A
119
No Different Than the National Rate
38
Number of Cases Too Small
6

ASC-1 through ASC-11 quality measures — Washington state means

Each row is the mean CMS-published rate across Washingtonfacilities that meet the measure’s reporting threshold. Lower is better for adverse-event measures; higher is better for the prophylactic-antibiotic process measure. Facilities CMS suppressed for low case volume are excluded from the mean, not counted as zero.

MeasureDirectionState meanFacilities reporting
Patient burn rateLower is better0.00%82
Unplanned hospital transfer/admissionLower is better0.02%94
Wrong site, side, patient, or procedureLower is better0.00%85
All-cause hospital readmission rateLower is better0.06%96
Appropriate prophylactic antibiotic useHigher is better90.74%33
Cataract surgery complication rateLower is better86.72%3

Highest-volume ASCs — Washington

Top 25 by ASC-12 reportable case volume (a procedural-volume signal, not a quality measure).

FacilityCityASC-12 casesCategory
Gastroenterology associates llcOLYMPIA4731No Different Than the National Rate
Northwest endoscopy center llcBELLINGHAM4388No Different Than the National Rate
Olympia multi specialty clinic ambulatory procedures cntr pllcOLYMPIA3176No Different Than the National Rate
The polyclinicSEATTLE3125No Different Than the National Rate
Spokane digestive disease center psSPOKANE3113No Different Than the National Rate
Digestive disease and endoscopy center pllcSILVERDALE2975No Different Than the National Rate
Washington gastroenterologyTACOMA2895No Different Than the National Rate
Puget sound gastroenterology psSEATTLE2649No Different Than the National Rate
The everett clinicEVERETT2634No Different Than the National Rate
The vancouver clinic incVANCOUVER2430No Different Than the National Rate
Mid columbia endoscopy center llcKENNEWICK2249No Different Than the National Rate
Washington gastroenterologyPUYALLUP1990No Different Than the National Rate
Eastside endoscopy center pllcISSAQUAH1843No Different Than the National Rate
Washington gastroenterologyFEDERAL WAY1691No Different Than the National Rate
Eastside endoscopy center pllcBELLEVUE1638No Different Than the National Rate
Puget sound gastroetnerology at kirklandevergreen endo ctrKIRKLAND1621No Different Than the National Rate
Western washington medical group endoscopy center dba the endoscopy centerEVERETT1564No Different Than the National Rate
Peacehealth gastroenterology endoscopy centerLONGVIEW1445No Different Than the National Rate
Washington gastroenterologyGIG HARBOR1339No Different Than the National Rate
Puyallup endoscopy centerPUYALLUP1211No Different Than the National Rate
Edmonds endoscopy centerEDMONDS1182No Different Than the National Rate
Virginia mason medical centerBELLEVUE899No Different Than the National Rate
Kadlec regional medical center dba kadlec ambulatory endoscopy center lee campusRICHLAND865No Different Than the National Rate
Pacmed ascSEATTLE828No Different Than the National Rate
Salmon surgery centerSILVERDALE781No Different Than the National Rate

Washington ambulatory surgical centers — FAQ

How many ambulatory surgical centers are Medicare-certified in Washington?
163 Medicare-certified ambulatory surgical centers operate in Washington as of the CMS Care Compare ASC Quality snapshot (2026-05-07). Every facility carries a National Provider Identifier — ASCs are the only Care Compare facility type with a 100% deterministic NPI bridge.
What ASC quality measures does Washington report?
CMS publishes ASC-1 through ASC-12. This page aggregates the state mean for the per-facility rate measures that have at least one reporting facility in Washington, plus the ASC-12 colonoscopy follow-up performance category. Measures are CMS-published rates: lower is better for adverse-event measures (burns, transfers, wrong-site events, readmissions, cataract complications) and higher is better for appropriate prophylactic antibiotic use.
Why are some facilities missing a quality rate?
CMS suppresses a measure when a facility falls below the minimum case volume for that measure in the reporting window. Suppressed facilities are excluded from each state mean rather than counted as zero, so the averages reflect only facilities CMS actually scored.
Where does this ASC data come from and how current is it?
All columns trace to the CMS Care Compare Ambulatory Surgical Center Quality dataset (PDC 4jcv-atw7), source-modified 2025-12-16. Fonteum redistributes the public-domain CMS file without alteration and links every row to its provenance record; cross-check any facility at Medicare.gov.

Compare other facility types

Every Fonteum Care Compare module carries the same per-facility provenance for Washington and the rest of the country.

Nursing homesHome healthHospiceDialysisHospitalsAll modules

Compliance posture

Methodology · Corrections log · Editorial policy

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily reconciliation

Published counts are reconciled against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Platform
Platform overviewAPIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots
Solutions
All solutionsExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & enrichmentAudit evidenceProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams
Data & sources
Coverage & sourcesBrowse all datasetsState Medicaid exclusionsFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareSanctionsOwnershipStaffingDeficienciesSpecial Focus Facilities
Developers
Developer hubDocsAPI referenceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrationsWebhooks
Research
Research hubHospital margin gapProvider access gapsGlossaryComparisonsCitationsWhy Fonteum
Company
AboutPressCustomersPricingContactEditorial policyCorrections
Trust & legal
TrustQualitySecurityPrivacy policyTerms of serviceMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

·hello@fonteum.com

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Request access→

The substrate, by the numbers

44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
35dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
65reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures